#Mammoth tank command and conquer how to#

Well fuck it, we put a Nuclear Reactor inside of the Tank and it's now faster along with being efficient at letting out heat. We could make it faster but it would wear out the parts faster as well and put it in the shop for another 8 months (These parts have to be custom made btw and shipped). Our mammoth tank has now held up traffic due to how slow it is. We find ourselves in Iraq, as is typical, we are going for a patrol. Now we have to go find a battle to get ourselves into. Besides the fact we've used enough money here to build probably 150 Main USA Battle Tanks due to research, contracting, development of parts/tech. You could forgo this but you dont want to do that in battle.Д¤.

#Mammoth tank command and conquer how to#

The design may be there but you have to figure out how to make sure this thing doesn't over heat, how it aims and such along with testing. During production it would take alot of money, time and resources to develop this, not just build it. It's the equivalent of buying a semi with two trailers to go pick up groceries when you could just buy a Truck or SUV.ДЈ. It doesn't make sense to have a super tank go up against an old soviet tank fielded by some group that just found it when you can use a less costly tank (abrams) to do the same job. Actual Tank on Tank warfare is extremely rare now and days due to the fact only superpowers would really be capable of doing so. Now that I say it even artillery is going out of fashion.Дў. The caliber of guns is irrelevant with the development of missiles, artillery and railguns. They have since retired almost all 5 of them. Russia has the Typhoon Class submarine which is the world's largest sub. The only country that could build something of this magnitude (the correct way at least and have it working)В is a superpower. Many battles today are not major nation wide but more so proxie wars fought by militant groups. There is no point due to there not being a world war going on. Problems would arise before, during and after development.ДЎ. Say it was built however and ignore all the logics and whatever along with Maus history. And your enemy will just build a bigger anti-tank missile.Д«esides the obvious of what was mentioned above it would simply have no practical usage in today's modern day era. AA weapons are kinda delicate and fragile, so you probably want them mounted on separate vehicles rather than onВ main battle tanks (just like in real life!).ДЄnd lastly, once your tank gets to a certain size, there's just no way you can put enough armor on it to protect the whole thing.

So that just leaves the anti-aircraft function.I think there's some tanks that can fire AA missiles out of their main guns, but I don't know how common that is. Whereas when you're a big cruiser or battleship, you're shooting at other big cruisers or battleships, so having multiple guns on each turret makes more sense.ДЄs for missiles, I don't think there'a any real-life situation where'd you want to use guided missiles against infantry (missiles are expensiveВ and I don't think there's any homing mechanism to target people), especially when you can just fire HE shells. This is even a problem in APB where you have to adjust your aim between the two shots when you're in a heavy or Mammoth tank, but in a Medium tank you can just hold the gun steady in place. I'm pretty sure that for any real-life tank, you'd only ever want to have gun, because you need the accuracy when shooting at other tanks and stuff. Oh and the p1000 ratte would have had a battleship type autoloader ide suspect because of how big its guns and the tank is So this beast existed but never saw combat so I guess you could say basically the mammoth tank existed just not the way we think it would. However,В it might have been faster:В this thing (the Maus tank)В could go about 12 Kmh/ or 8 mph but I think the mammoth would have gone maybe 12 mph or less. The Maus tank alone is about the size of around 3 or 5В minivans stacked on top of each other,В but ide imagine that the mammoth tank would have been worse than the Maus tank way worse, and it might have weighed more than this small child of a beast compared to a mammoth tank. Well then your in for some history my boy this is the panzer Vlll Maus this had 2 prototypes but one was captured by the Russians and the p1000 ratte: which was only a tank developed on paper, but was never made so it was a design slash imagination but, this thing would have been about 3 times the size of theВ MausВ tank, which is huge.